Transfer Pricing: 5 Tips

David McDonald from PwC suggests in TMI (Treasury Management International) 5 things that help you stay active and up to date on transfer pricing:

  1. Statement: Group Tax is responsible for transfer pricing. Treasury sets and applies the policies.
    Risk: Without clear communication between the treasury and tax departments, there is a risk of penalties.
  2. Statement: We have a great policy established and 2017 by a specialist and run it this way.
    Risk: In 2020, the OECD published detailed guidelines focused on IC-loans, cash pool, guarantees, hedging, and captive insurance. We stayed tuned and made the necessary updates.
  3. Statement: We have benchmarks; we use fixed rates from 2020.
    Risk: Prices have changed significantly in the last 12 months. The use of outdated benchmarks is dangerous.
  4. Statement: The excellent bank relationship ensures indicative quotes for IC-transactions.
    Risk: OECD guidance state clearly that bank quotes are not an acceptable form because tax authority can/will ignore them. Use a transfer pricing benchmark that can be defended.
  5. Statement: Performing detailed analyses on every loan and related party.
    Risk: IC-Loan amount/size matters for tax at risk. A 5m IC-loan is less at risk than a 50m IC-loan. Use a standard policy that applies to 80-90% of intra-group loans and only evaluate the largest transactions.

Details in the PwC report on TMI (Login required, report available at Tomato)

Transfer Pricing: New German Guidelines

Gerhard Foth and Andreas Wiesner of KPMG explain in their blog the new administrative guidelines regarding audits of transfer pricing matters recently issued by the German Ministry of Finance. These guidelines may impact all groups in Germany that are subject to Transfer Pricing legislation. The Administrative Guidelines 2020 update earlier guidelines on Transfer Pricing and replace certain parts of the Administrative Guidelines 2005.

Important for taxpayers:

  • Ensure that they have access to relevant evidence at the time of the audit;
  • Maintain data and information that allows tax authorities to apply other Transfer Pricing methods than the one actually chosen;
  • Information such as accounts ready for consolidation can be requested by the tax authorities;
  • Emails, messages etc. can be requested by the authorities for a further “reality check” between the information given in the Transfer Pricing documentation and the actual conduct of the parties.

Topics relevant for the documentation preparation:

  • The Guidelines introduce a “best method rule” (in the past, taxpayers had to apply “an adequate method”); one now also needs to justify why other methods have not been applied;
  • German language of the documentation still seems to be very important, although, in practice, this is often handled in English;
  • The increasing requirements to provide evidence and support to the “best method” come along with a reduced burden to estimate the income of a taxpayer.

Transfer Pricing Implications of the COVID-19

By Martin Schneider
Fabian Arnold and I were working next door when Tomato was mandated to be part of the interim project in 2018. Fabian prepared the following study. Congrats Fabian, excellent work! 

With the 2017 revision of the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines the OECD employs the “concept of control over risk” as the turning point in determining whether or not an associated party, which is  contractually assuming risks, is from a transfer pricing perspective entitled to receive the higher returns associated with such risks. This IBFD* article by Fabian Arnold provides a historical context and critically evaluates this concept from a tax policy, general arm’s length as well as international corporate tax framework perspective.

Mit der 2017 erfolgten Überarbeitung der OECD-Verrechnungspreisrichtlinien verwendet die OECD das “concept of control over risk” als Wendepunkt bei der Bestimmung, ob eine verbundene Partei, die vertraglich Risiken übernimmt, aus einer Verrechnungspreis-perspektive berechtigt ist, die mit diesen Risiken verbundenen höheren Renditen zu erhalten. Dieser IBFD*-Artikel von Fabian Arnold liefert einen historischen Kontext und bewertet dieses Konzept kritisch aus einer steuerpolitischen Perspektive, unter allgemeinen “arm’s length”-Überlegungen sowie vor dem Hintergrund der Rahmenbedingungen des internationalen Unternehmenssteuerumfelds.

The Guidance focuses on four issues:

  • Comparability analysis;
  • Losses and the allocation of COVID-19 specific costs;
  • Government assistance  programs;
  • Advance pricing agreements.

Graphical user interface, text, application, email

Description automatically generatedQuelle: https://www.ibfd.org

Graphical user interface, text, application

Description automatically generatedQuelle: https://www.ibfd.org

*IBFD is the world’s foremost authority on cross-border taxation. Tax practitioners from all over the world rely on its high-quality, independent tax research.

OECD’s Guidelines for Transfer Pricing and Cash Pools

PwC Switzerland’s David McDonald and Michalis Louca discussed on July 7 how inter-company financing transactions should be priced in the light of OECD’s new guidelines for financial transactions.

Key changes and principles

  • A new description of a transaction: an assessment of options realistically available to borrower and lender including an assessment of market/economic conditions.
  • The volume of loan must not exceed the amount that the borrower could/would have borrowed.
  • Only a small return can be justified to a lender/guarantor/treasury center.

Challenges and Actions
Groups will need a process for new transactions (assessing the key terms, the quantum of the loan, the lender, and the borrower perspective) and to perform a one-off review of existing transactions for compliance with the new requirements.

Treasury Functions – intra-group loans and cash pooling (CP)

  • Pricing loans between group companies will require credit rating analyses.
  • Interest rates should be benchmarked; bank quotes should not be used as benchmarks.
  • Most cash pools will need to amend the rationale for economic returns.
  • The rates that participants get from the pool versus local market rates should be tested.
  • Cash pool positions should be only short term.

Financial guarantees:

  • No guarantee fees payable unless there is an explicit guarantee.
  • Perform benefit assessment.
  • MNEs need to assess when a guarantee fee is/is not charged accordingly.
  • Groups may choose to change the agreements covering the guarantee, rather than changing the pricing.

PwC Slides of this Webinar July 7th 2020 
Ziehen Sie Deutsch vor?

Das HSLU in Zug offeriert am 21. und 28.10.2020, 4.11.2020 den Kurse Fachkurs Swiss Treasury Practice: Aktuelle Herausforderungen im Corporate Treasury durch.

“Der Fachkurs thematisiert aktuelle steuerliche und rechtliche Problemstellungen u.a. in den Bereichen Transfer Pricing, Cash Pooling und Accounting”

Veranstaltung und Anmeldung